Andy Saw It Coming!

January 3, 2008

In The Warhol Economy: How Fashion, Art, and Music Drive New York City, author Elizabeth Currid articulates how the New York economy (one of the largest regional economies in the world) is propelled by the artists, writers, fashion designers and musicians that live there, equally as much as those in the white-collar/financial sectors. Since culture and commerce work together in a mutually beneficial manner, any city that lacks a boisterous arts and culture scene fails to reap its commercial potential.

So what exactly is required for a vibrant arts scene to exist? Simple: cheap rent, studio/production space, and plenty of gallery and exhibition centers. Sadly, in Vancouver and abroad, over-inflated real estate and the rising cost of living is destroying the much-needed balance between business and the arts. With Vancouver’s art/culture hubs Gastown and Strathcona well on their way to complete gentrification, the city could face cultural extinction. Will Vancouver evolve into a culturally absent wasteland of foreign-owned condos? Is it there already?

In an era where cultural capital and creativity is becoming increasingly valued, governments, creative agencies, and philanthropists should be doing more to create urban environments where the arts can flourish. Otherwise, our cities will fail to evolve unique cultural identities ultimately stifling economic progress.

Comments


  • Lamar, On
  • January 3rd, 2008 at 4:26 pm Said:

Elizabeth Currid sounds like Richard Florida for LES hipsters

I agree with you that cheap rent does help the art scene to develop, but I would not go so far as to say that real estate prices in Vancouver is destroying balance between business and the arts. Art does not only imply poverty and shabbiness. Aspiring artists are still able to get a decent accomodation in the city, however high the real estate prices are. Or do you think it is much easier for a young family to buy a condo or a house of htir own?

  • The Aesthetic Poetic, On
  • January 9th, 2008 at 3:31 pm Said:

I think it is way easier for a young family with duel income to rent a condo in Vancouver. I think being a young artist in this city is extremely difficult.

  • The Publics, On
  • January 9th, 2008 at 9:01 pm Said:

Vancouver real estate doesn’t know what he/she is talking about.The life of an aspiring artist in Vancouver definitely does imply poverty and shabbiness, a simple fact that VRE would realize if he/she had ever had any contact with an aspiring artist.

subsidized living space is very limited and the only other viable option for a dedicated artist is the ghetto.

All right, folks, I admit that it IS difficult for a young, aspiring artist to rent a condo in Vancouver.
You are also right when saying that subsidized living space is very limited in the city.
But please also admit that artists are not the only group of people that find it difficult to get a decent housing nowadays.
The Aesthetic Poetic: how about a young couple of two artists with dual income renting a condo in Vancouver?

  • The Aesthetic Poetic, On
  • January 10th, 2008 at 1:45 pm Said:

I think the focus of the article is less about the cost of real estate and more about how the arts community benefits business in any commerce center. At the end of the day, Vancouver real estate is unfordable for pretty much anybody other than the super rich. To say that this is not affecting arts and culture, would be ridiculous. On your site you have posted a graph that illustrates the inflationary trends (which are a little extreme)! I would like to know what type of economics price increases of this magnitude are based on. Obviously supply and demand has a lot to do with it, but so does foreign ownership as well. The city will be unable to have a boisterous future, when its young cant afford to stay here. Also, it is likely that this next generation of young people will be the first generation in awhile to acquire less net wealth than their parents. This is because most wealthy Vancouverites today have made their wealth off of the rising costs of real estate to begin with. I welcome your thoughts!

PS. Most artists, even if they lived with an other artist would live well below the poverty line.

Leave a Reply