Photographers Are Terrorists?

March 26, 2008

Street photography is all about catching an everyday act in the moment. It requires instinct, skill, discipline, creativity, spontaneity and a creative eye. Photographs of this nature reveal beauty in the mundane, encapsulating precious moments of time that within a blink of an eye are gone. One of my homies in Vancouver calls it “posting up“. In European cities like London they call it terrorism, pedophilia, or espionage. All to often the act of snapping a couple of unsuspecting photos results in extreme violence towards the photographer. “In the past year, the photography blogs have buzzed with tales of harassment, even violence. There’s the war photographer who dodged bullets abroad only to be beaten up in his own South London backyard by a paranoid parent who (wrongly) thought his child was being photographed. There’s the amateur photographer who was punched prostrate in the London Tube after refusing to give up his film to a stranger; the case of the man in Hull, swooped on by police after taking photographs in a shopping center. ‘Any person who appears to be taking photos in a covert manner should expect to be stopped and spoken to by police …’” ran the Humberside force’s statement, The London Times tells us.

There’s a war going on outside and no one is safe. In a society that is becoming increasingly paranoid, artists are now all to often being mistaken for a shadier type of folk that’s up to no good. So much so, that “A new poster campaign by the Metropolitan Police is inviting Londoners to call a hotline if they don’t like the look of a photographer. ‘Thousands of people take photos every day,’ runs the text. ‘What if one of them seems odd?’ The poster states that terrorists use cameras for surveillance. Life with a camera might be about to turn tougher”, we read.

For an art form that’s over a century old and deeply rooted in European culture, it’s sad how the fear of terrorism has quickly turned street photography into a sinister and questionable activity. “In France, traditionally one of the great centers of street photography, the law now says you own the rights to your own image, so street photography’s become a dead art,” says The London Times. From personal experience, I too have noticed this. Other than at typical tourist attractions, those lurking the not so frequented streets of France with an appareil-photo need to remain cautious.

Comments


  • Adrian, On
  • March 26th, 2008 at 1:46 pm Said:

well.. why not ask the subjects after gettin the super nice snap.. hell if someone snaps a shot of me doing something timely outside I would like them to ask if its ok to publish or show-off atfer they take the pic. I mean id say yes, but its common decency… or so i thought.

If photographers and photojournalists went around asking for people’s permission, then image-driven journalism would cease to exist. The only way to illustrate what is happening in the world would be through text, but then why shouldn’t writers have to ask for permission as well?

  • Adrian, On
  • March 27th, 2008 at 12:30 pm Said:

The examples given didnt seem to be anything to do with photojournalism. We are talking street photo’s on the streets of paris and london or whatever.

So, snap the subject doing whatever on the street, then talk to them after. More effort, more work. But if the photos good it should be worth it.

And to bring up the writers thing.. A person’s “IMAGE” is a protected property. This has nothing to do with writing. I know, the easiest way to show a point of your perspective it to through out some ridiculous “what-if” scenario.

Be realistic: You’re walkin around downtown whatever, you see some intersting scene, you snap a pic. You walk towards and give em a little low-down on how they’ve been captured on film. Atleast let them know the context of the pic, or where it will be seen, and with what acompaning material.

Still in the end, the laws being put in order, and the reactions are ridiculous. I can see the point of; Public space, Public action, free to the public!

  • The Aesthetic Poetic, On
  • March 27th, 2008 at 6:13 pm Said:

Adrian, I totally know what you are saying but I am gonna side with the Publics on this one. For good Journalistic photographs, photographers need to be able to document what they see on the streets free of permission.

” A person’s “IMAGE” is a protected property”

I don’t think this is true actually. In what country?

  • Sean Orr, On
  • March 29th, 2008 at 2:46 pm Said:

Took a picture of a reflection in a window. almost got punched.

ah, I glossed over that last paragraph. Wow, the birthplace of cineme verite no longer permits street photography. Doesn’t make much sense though seeing as any terrorist can access google earth.

Leave a Reply