Corporate Infiltration

May 13, 2008

Recent years have seen street art and its central figures become as mainstream as all over print tee shirts and French electronica. Today, mega-corporations are increasingly incorporating wheatpastes into their marketing mix and doing their best to cash in off the art form’s caché. Two weeks ago, the mythological Banksy, with corporate funding from Eurostar, hosted a massive stencil party dubbed “The Cans Festival” in a tunnel underneath London’s Waterloo Station. Its whereabouts was initially kept secret while A-list artists from around the world painted the walls and erected sculptures. Upon completion, the address was announced and those attending were encouraged to bring their own stencils and paint the walls with some artwork of their own. As you can imagine, this generated a huge amount of on/off-line publicity for both the involved artists and Eurostar. Several photos of what transpired can be viewed here.

The other day while walking the streets of Vancouver I came across an awesome wheatpaste of a dude with scooter handlebars sticking through his shirt where his head should have been. Initially, I was really stoked on the piece, yet became somewhat disappointed to discover that it was an advertisement for Vespa designed by Dan Bergeron aka Fauxreel for Dentsu, aimed at promoting the unique fashion stylings of people who ride the scooters. I was further surprised to learn that the advertisements were also pasted up in Toronto, Montreal and Calgary as well. Does advertising through street art compromise the art form’s integrity?

Comments


  • Jon, On
  • May 13th, 2008 at 3:33 pm Said:

Saw these, enjoyed em… but soon figured they must be some form of advertising. Thanks for explaining, though maybe it would have been better if I had never known…

Something like separating the artist from the art?

You may be my favorite blogger in Vancouver… good to see you safely home — keep up the good work.

  • Jon, On
  • May 13th, 2008 at 3:50 pm Said:

just saw this & thought youd like: http://www.buzzfeed.com/scott/muto

  • Sean Orr, On
  • May 14th, 2008 at 12:52 am Said:

yeah, saw these all over toronto and was like, dude is also here, then I saw them inside a Vespa store.

I knew these were vespa ads immediatly, they were way too clean, non-threatening and meaningless not to be ads.

I hope Vespa, the agency responsible and any other cunt who tries this shit is appropriately arrested, jailed and fined the maximum amount.

the answer to your last question is yes. as we have seen with hip-hop, graffiti and many other art forms and cultures as soon as it is co-opted by corporations and used as a mainstream vehicle its integrity is always compromised.

the real question is, does anyone, other than writers/streets artists and those that keep an eye out for that type of work, even notice these ads for what they are? i would think no, seems like a whole lot of nothing to me……

  • jack, On
  • May 16th, 2008 at 2:23 pm Said:

These were actually designed by an artist, not the agency. Dan Bergeron aka fauxreel. fauxreel.ca - his “projection” are pretty cool.

First off, I’d like to express my disappointment to the author for not giving the artist his due. Like Jack says, these posters were designed and photographed by fauxreel, a Toronto-based street artist and photographer. Whether you like the work or not, at least give him the credit he’s due.

I met Dan when he was here and we had a pretty good chat about this project. I have to say I really liked the image when I first saw it, and was disappointed to hear that it was advertising for Vespa. One of my favorite things about street art (and one of the initial things that drew me to express myself through this medium) is that it advertises for no-one.

That said, I think that regardless of its purpose it is a very effective and well-crafted image done by a master photographer. I also really appreciated the other (unsponsored) work that Dan put up while he was here - follow the link below for some flicks. I also appreciate the hard work that has gone into this project - from conception to execution to dissemination, it’s a lot of work for one person. I mean, it took four days to cut out each individual poster by hand….that’s a hell of a lot of time and effort.

Art costs money to make, regardless of whether or not it hangs in a gallery or is put up on the street. For any artist to take on a project of this magnitude (5 cities across Canada) it would be almost impossible without some outside form of support. I do think, however that it’s too bad for Dan that for many people in the street art comunity and outside of it, this will be their first impression of his work, and they’ll be quick to label him/write him off as “that guy who did the Vespa ads” when his body of work is much greater than this.

It was a job he was approached by Vespa and hired to do, that he took on only on the condition that he retain complete creative control over the creation of the image and it’s placement. In addition to street art, he supports himself as a commercial photographer, so I can see how it was not too much of a stretch to then take what he does commercially to the next step of putting it up in the streets himself.

And put it up he did - working 8-10 hour shifts, he and one friend managed to cover the whole city in just two or three days. I gotta give him props for that.

fauxreel will be back this summer (not for Vespa) and - regardless of my feelings about this project in particular - I still have respect for him as an artist who has been making large-scale street art for a very long time - and will probably be going out wheatpasting with him when he gets here.

Every movement that has started out as underground has been co-opted by mass media and other corporate entities in their continual search for ways to pull consumers in. This is nothing new, and should be a shock to anyone anymore. I don’t like it, but I accept it as a part of today’s culture. The decision to undertake this Vespa project was a controversial and complicated choice, and I’m sure Dan’s received a lot of flack from other artists and the general public because of it. I understand why he did it, but would not have made the decision myself. (or would I? That’s easy to say in theory but when starting at a contract filled with $$$$ and the possibility of traveling around canada getting up in every major city, it would be an extremely difficult thing to turn down.)

Ok long comment, sorry. Been thinking about this stuff a lot lately. Here’s the link to some more of his stuff.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/shallom/sets/72157604552027742/

  • The Aesthetic Poetic, On
  • May 17th, 2008 at 12:00 pm Said:

Cool, Jack and Indigo Child. I’ll update the article with the artists name. Thanks for sending it in. FYI, this post really isn’t about the artist though. It’s about how this isn’t street art, it’s an advertisement for a campaign.

“Does advertising through street art compromise the art form’s integrity?”

No more so than any other form of art that has been co-opted by advertising companies in their relentless search for methods of hooking new customers.
Because no matter how many companies jump on this bandwagon there will always be artists out there who are keepin it real. Doing it for love not money.

Leave a Reply